Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On sön, 2011-09-04 at 12:06 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Maybe we need a few members that test a large number of locales. > (Anyone feel like donating resources? I'm currently providing > resources for seven, which I think is sufficient :-) ) If we're just testing different configuration combin

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-05 Thread David Fetter
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 09:39:39AM -0400, Joe Abbate wrote: > On 09/04/2011 08:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > In what locale does 'sc' sort before 's4'? (And I'd humbly suggest that > > whatever locale it is is possibly broken.) > > EBCDIC? If you have any EBCDIC machines for the buildfarm, tha

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-04 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > On 09/04/2011 11:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think the real question that needs to be asked here is why there's not >> a buildfarm member running the tests in Czech locale. And maybe some >> of the other ones that have been problematic in the past. We should not >> have

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 09/04/2011 11:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan writes: Well, I don't think we are obliged to cater for locales that break ASCII ordering. The logical conclusion of that position is that there's no need to make the regression tests pass in any other locale than C. Which is not the pr

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-04 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > Well, I don't think we are obliged to cater for locales that break ASCII > ordering. The logical conclusion of that position is that there's no need to make the regression tests pass in any other locale than C. Which is not the project policy, and we (including you, wit

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-04 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > On 09/04/2011 10:23 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On sön, 2011-09-04 at 08:57 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > In what locale does 'sc' sort before 's4'? >> In Czech. > Well, I don't think we are obliged to cater for locales that break ASCII > ordering. We've changed r

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On sön, 2011-09-04 at 10:47 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Well, I don't think we are obliged to cater for locales that break ASCII > ordering. We do cater for that. See commit 8cd375526790c5be8ae24c77f13ac446adda88b6 Author: Peter Eisentraut Date: Mon Mar 9 15:04:21 2009 + Tweak th

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 09/04/2011 10:23 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On sön, 2011-09-04 at 08:57 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: In what locale does 'sc' sort before 's4'? In Czech. (And I'd humbly suggest that whatever locale it is is possibly broken.) There were some discussions about this in the past; it's app

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-04 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On sön, 2011-09-04 at 08:57 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > In what locale does 'sc' sort before 's4'? In Czech. > (And I'd humbly suggest that whatever locale it is is possibly > broken.) There were some discussions about this in the past; it's apparently based on a national standard and complet

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-04 Thread Joe Abbate
On 09/04/2011 08:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > In what locale does 'sc' sort before 's4'? (And I'd humbly suggest that > whatever locale it is is possibly broken.) EBCDIC? Joe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www

Re: [HACKERS] regress test failed

2011-09-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
On 09/04/2011 08:23 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: Hello there is one regress test, that failed on my f14 [pavel@nemesis postgresql]$ uname -a Linux nemesis 2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686.PAE #1 SMP Tue Aug 16 21:12:22 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux regression.diffs