hi,
> y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) writes:
>> how about making heap_form_tuple and its variants use smaller natts for
>> tuples whose trailing columns are NULL?
>
> This idea has been proposed before, and rejected on the basis that it's
> unlikely to save enough to be worth the cycle
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) writes:
> how about making heap_form_tuple and its variants use smaller natts for
> tuples whose trailing columns are NULL?
This idea has been proposed before, and rejected on the basis that it's
unlikely to save enough to be worth the cycles needed to che
