On Thursday 09 June 2005 22:03, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Someone commented to me recently that they usually use psql's \x
> > "expanded output" mode, but find that it produces pretty illegible
> > results for psql slash commands such as \d. I can't really see a reason
> > you would _want_
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Neil Conway wrote:
Someone commented to me recently that they usually use psql's \x "expanded
output" mode, but find that it produces pretty illegible results for psql
slash commands such as \d. I can't really see a reason you would _want_
"expanded output" mode for the re
Someone commented to me recently that they usually use psql's \x
"expanded output" mode, but find that it produces pretty illegible
results for psql slash commands such as \d. I can't really see a reason
you would _want_ "expanded output" mode for the result sets of psql
slash commands. Would a
