Re: [HACKERS] proposal - plpgsql: execute using into

2006-04-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > There are some problems about replacing string values in the SQL string. > > > >Doesn't the Oracle implementation already imply a solution to that? > > > > I don't know. I didn't find any detail documentation about it. I don't know > what Oracle exactly do. > > >I thin

Re: [HACKERS] proposal - plpgsql: execute using into

2006-03-28 Thread Pavel Stehule
> There are some problems about replacing string values in the SQL string. Doesn't the Oracle implementation already imply a solution to that? I don't know. I didn't find any detail documentation about it. I don't know what Oracle exactly do. I think we'd be best off to leave EXECUTE alone

Re: [HACKERS] proposal - plpgsql: execute using into

2006-03-27 Thread Tom Lane
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Current EXECUTE statemtn doesn't support other way for parametrisation than > concating strings. It works well but it's little bit unreadable. Oracle's > statement EXECUTE has positional replacement feature. > ... > There are some problems about repla