On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I pulled down the current snapshot, and there doesn't seem to be
> anything wrong with preproc.c in it. So the lack of bison on your
> machine wasn't the issue anyway; it should've compiled the preproc.c
> from the snapshot without complaint.
>
> It doe
* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010207 17:24] wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now I get:
> > byacc -d preproc.y
> > byacc: f - maximum table size exceeded
> > gmake[4]: *** [preproc.c] Error 2
>
> Better install bison if you want to work with CVS sources ...
> the lack o
BTW, I pulled down the current snapshot, and there doesn't seem to be
anything wrong with preproc.c in it. So the lack of bison on your
machine wasn't the issue anyway; it should've compiled the preproc.c
from the snapshot without complaint.
It does sound like there may be some outright flakines
Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now I get:
> byacc -d preproc.y
> byacc: f - maximum table size exceeded
> gmake[4]: *** [preproc.c] Error 2
Better install bison if you want to work with CVS sources ...
the lack of bison probably explains why it's failing for you on
this system whe
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In today's (2/7/2k1) snapshot from hub, I'm getting this:
>
> > gcc -pipe -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
> > -I../../../../src/include -I./../include -DMAJOR_VERSION=2 -DMINOR_VERSION=8
>
Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In today's (2/7/2k1) snapshot from hub, I'm getting this:
> gcc -pipe -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
> -I../../../../src/include -I./../include -DMAJOR_VERSION=2 -DMINOR_VERSION=8
>-DPATCHLEVEL=0
> -DINCLUDE_PATH=\"/usr/local/p
