Re: [HACKERS] poorly written builtin functions

2003-08-19 Thread Neil Conway
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 12:39:53AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I assume this has been addressed? Yes, Tom checked a fix into CVS for the functions in question. -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

Re: [HACKERS] poorly written builtin functions

2003-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
I assume this has been addressed? --- Neil Conway wrote: > I'm working on writing a script that automatically tests all the > built-in functions. As a first step, I just passed NULL for all > of the arguments for each built-

Re: [HACKERS] poorly written builtin functions

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since the culprit functions all seem related (I believe they're > all generated by src/backend/utils/mb/conversion_procs), I'd > imagine this should be pretty easy to fix. They should all be marked STRICT. Not sure how this got missed before; thanks for c