Alvaro Herrera writes:
> I agree a full rewrite is sensible, but that particular wording looks
> slightly odd to me. I would either have added an "an", or pluralized
> the subject, so either
> "trigger's return list must have an even number of elements"
> or
> "trigger's return lists must have
Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, if we're going to change this message at all, I'm inclined to
> rewrite it completely, because it doesn't really follow the style
> guidelines. How about "trigger's return list must have even number of
> elements"?
I agree a full rewrite is sensible, but that particular w
Euler Taveira writes:
> On 16-09-2015 10:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, if we're going to change this message at all, I'm inclined to
>> rewrite it completely, because it doesn't really follow the style
>> guidelines. How about "trigger's return list must have even number of
>> elements"?
> Works
On 16-09-2015 10:57, Tom Lane wrote:
Euler Taveira writes:
This simple patch improves a sentence. Spotted while working on translation.
I concur that spelling out "#" as "number" is an improvement, but I'm
curious which backend error you think this matches?
It is sort of...
utils/adt/json.
Euler Taveira writes:
> This simple patch improves a sentence. Spotted while working on translation.
I concur that spelling out "#" as "number" is an improvement, but I'm
curious which backend error you think this matches?
Also, if we're going to change this message at all, I'm inclined to
rewri
