Re: [HACKERS] plperl db access documentation enhancement

2010-03-11 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > Patch applied for 9.0. We don't normally backpatch such documentation > > > improvements unless we receive multiple reports of confusion. > > > > I think that's a mistake in this case. The documentation wasn't > >

Re: [HACKERS] plperl db access documentation enhancement

2010-02-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Patch applied for 9.0. We don't normally backpatch such documentation > > improvements unless we receive multiple reports of confusion. > > I think that's a mistake in this case. The documentation wasn't > confusing -- it was bogus. (Actuall

Re: [HACKERS] plperl db access documentation enhancement

2010-02-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Patch applied for 9.0. We don't normally backpatch such documentation > improvements unless we receive multiple reports of confusion. I think that's a mistake in this case. The documentation wasn't confusing -- it was bogus. (Actually, the bug fixing is a smaller chang

Re: [HACKERS] plperl db access documentation enhancement

2010-02-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied for 9.0. We don't normally backpatch such documentation improvements unless we receive multiple reports of confusion. --- Alexey Klyukin wrote: > Hello, > > We were asked by Enova Financial to improve the doc