=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= writes:
> I came up with a stack of context structures that gets pushed when a
> PL/Python starts being executed and popped when it returns. At first
> they contained just a scratch memory context used by PLyDict_FromTuple.
> Then under the premise of confirming th
On 14/02/12 01:35, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= writes:
>> It's not very comfortable, but
>> I think PLyDict_FromTuple can be allowed to be non-reentrant.
>
> I think that's pretty short-sighted. Even if it's safe today (which
> I am not 100% convinced of), there are plenty
=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= writes:
> On 12/02/12 00:48, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What's more, it's unclear that
>> it won't malfunction altogether if the function is used recursively
>> (ie, what if PLyDict_FromTuple ends up calling the same function again?)
> I was a bit worried about that, but
On 12/02/12 00:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= writes:
>> This is annoying for functions that plough through large tables, doing
>> some calculation. Attached is a patch that does the conversion of
>> PostgreSQL Datums into Python dict objects in a scratch memory context
>>
=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= writes:
> This is annoying for functions that plough through large tables, doing
> some calculation. Attached is a patch that does the conversion of
> PostgreSQL Datums into Python dict objects in a scratch memory context
> that gets reset every time.
As best I ca
