Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Oh sorry, it wasn't clear from the commit entry. It's not that
> DocBook doesn't support the character or that it can't be
> represented. It's just not supported in the document encoding we're
> using.
No, no, and no.
The reason that it doesn't work is that the doc
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:54:47AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > Well you could always use te HTML4 ı which most tools should
> > understand. At least browsers have good support for this kind of
> > entity.
>
> Please review the recent thread on pgsql-docs befo
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Well you could always use te HTML4 ı which most tools should
> understand. At least browsers have good support for this kind of
> entity.
Please review the recent thread on pgsql-docs before reiterating all the
suggestions.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.po
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:29:05PM -0300, Tom Lane wrote:
> Log Message:
> ---
> We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because dotless i is
> not in the character set supported by DocBook nor standard HTML. (Sorry
> Volkan.) Also replace random character-set references by a p
