Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore --help

2004-12-03 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Change it right now, and then we'll freeze. :) Done. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore --help

2004-12-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do we talk about "output commands" to do things, or directly about > > restoration? I think -O description should be > > -O, --no-owner skip restoration of object ownership > > This seems reasonable, but I wonder whether

Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore --help

2004-12-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 12:20:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > This seems reasonable, but I wonder whether we should hold it for 8.1. > There hasn't been any official declaration that translatable strings > are frozen for 8.0 --- but are we at that point yet? Even if we're > not at hard freeze, mino

Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore --help

2004-12-03 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do we talk about "output commands" to do things, or directly about > restoration? I think -O description should be > -O, --no-owner skip restoration of object ownership This seems reasonable, but I wonder whether we should hold it for 8.1.

Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore --help

2004-12-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:35:55PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > In pg_restore --help I see this: > > -O, --no-owner do not output commands to set object ownership > [...] > -x, --no-privileges skip restoration of access privileges > (grant/revoke) Sorry, of course the probl