Itagaki Takahiro writes:
> The attached is a patch to execute lo_unlink() before lo_create()
> in pg_restore.
Applied with corrections --- you had failed to ensure that pg_dump and
pg_restore produce the same output. I also took the opportunity to
schema-qualify the calls of lo_xxx functions, ju
Itagaki Takahiro writes:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> i think this one could be applied, just as is... there is no need for
>> docs, because the issue being fixed is not documented... maybe that
>> should be in doc of older releases?
> Sure, it was an undocumented behavior. Should we need to add d
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> i think this one could be applied, just as is... there is no need for
> docs, because the issue being fixed is not documented... maybe that
> should be in doc of older releases?
Sure, it was an undocumented behavior. Should we need to add details
of this patch to documen
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Itagaki
Takahiro wrote:
>
> The attached is a patch to execute lo_unlink() before lo_create()
> in pg_restore.
the patch applies almost cleanly (there are only minor and superfluos
hunks), compiles...
it works as expected...
this patch makes me wonder why we dump
