Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys

2001-04-03 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:34:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > We really need ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT for PK. > > That would be a cleaner way to do it, all right ... but for now, you can > just reach in and set the indisprimary flag in pg_index aft

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys

2001-04-03 Thread Philip Warner
At 14:33 3/04/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >I notice that pg_dump now dumps primary-key indexes in the style > >CREATE TABLE ... ( > "dest_index" integer DEFAULT ..., > Constraint "dest_addresses_pkey" Primary Key ("dest_index") >); > >Isn't this pretty darn stupid? Yep. >Previously, we

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys

2001-04-03 Thread Tom Lane
Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 14:33 3/04/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I notice that pg_dump now dumps primary-key indexes in the style >> >> CREATE TABLE ... ( >> "dest_index" integer DEFAULT ..., >> Constraint "dest_addresses_pkey" Primary Key ("dest_index") >> ); > My 7.0 dump