Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It had been dicussed on and off for quite some time. This limitation
> should only apply if you create dumps that contain objects owned by more
> than one user. (Does it? I didn't check.)
Yes, because "SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION yourself" is allowed
Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yes, but didn't the old code prompt you for passwords, or silently work
> > if you had things set to 'trust', while our new code requires
> > super-user?
>
> If you have things set to "trust", you can be superuser, eh?
>
> A password approach might be workable using ~/.pgpass,
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> It had been dicussed on and off for quite some time. This limitation
>> should only apply if you create dumps that contain objects owned by more
>> than one user. (Does it? I didn't check.)
> Yes, but didn't the old code pro
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > but I don't see how we can ignore a --no-reconnect flag --- we should
> > throw an error.
>
> We can ignore it because we don't reconnect. I only took out the flag
> because I noticed it was no longer tested anywhere after I removed
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but I don't see how we can ignore a --no-reconnect flag --- we should
> throw an error.
We can ignore it because we don't reconnect. I only took out the flag
because I noticed it was no longer tested anywhere after I removed the
\connect code paths. I'
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Seems we can silently ignore a --use-set-session-authorization flag
> > because that is now the default, but I don't see how we can ignore a
> > --no-reconnect flag --- we should throw an error.
>
> Why? The new bevavior of pg_dump is to neve
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Seems we can silently ignore a --use-set-session-authorization flag
> because that is now the default, but I don't see how we can ignore a
> --no-reconnect flag --- we should throw an error.
Why? The new bevavior of pg_dump is to never reconnect -- exactly the
point of th
