Re: [HACKERS] pg_arch.c call to sleep()

2004-11-08 Thread Magnus Hagander
> > We have the following warning on Windows: > > pgarch.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function `sleep' > > > To fix it we could include the right header (which appears to be > > in the Windows/Mingw case), or we could replace > the call by > > a call to pg_usleep(). > > is include

Re: [HACKERS] pg_arch.c call to sleep()

2004-11-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > We have the following warning on Windows: > > pgarch.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function `sleep' > > > To fix it we could include the right header (which appears to be > > in the Windows/Mingw case), or we could replac

Re: [HACKERS] pg_arch.c call to sleep()

2004-11-07 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: We have the following warning on Windows: pgarch.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function `sleep' To fix it we could include the right header (which appears to be in the Windows/Mingw case), or we could replace the cal

Re: [HACKERS] pg_arch.c call to sleep()

2004-11-07 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We have the following warning on Windows: > pgarch.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function `sleep' > To fix it we could include the right header (which appears to be > in the Windows/Mingw case), or we could replace the call by a > call to p