OK, removed from TODO. I figured it was as useful as pg_controldata but
can see what you say that those give information that you can't get any
other way, while oid2name info can be gotten another way. You can look
at the oid2name README for examples of its usage.
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I will add these items to the TODO list, unless someone else votes.
I was not thrilled with the idea of moving oid2name out of contrib
either, but kept silent to see if someone else would complain first ...
Basically I think that oid2name is a hacker's
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > > Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install by default
> > >
> >
> > Actually, to be accurate, I think databases are stored based on their
> > oid and tables/indexes are stored based on their relfilenode. That is
> > pretty confusing.
Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install by default
> >
>
> Actually, to be accurate, I think databases are stored based on their
> oid and tables/indexes are stored based on their relfilenode. That is
> pretty confusing. Do we still do the renaming?
I don'
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Now that we are changing relfilenode in 7.3, I think we need to rename
> oid2name to relfilenode2name, and perhaps move it into the main tree.
>
> TODO item added:
>
> Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install by default
>
Actually, to be accurate, I think dat
Justin Clift wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Now that we are changing relfilenode in 7.3, I think we need to rename
> > > oid2name to relfilenode2name, and perhaps move it into the main tree.
> > >
> > > TODO item added:
> > >
> > > Rename oid2name to relfile
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Now that we are changing relfilenode in 7.3, I think we need to rename
> > oid2name to relfilenode2name, and perhaps move it into the main tree.
> >
> > TODO item added:
> >
> > Rename oid2name to relfilenode2name and install by default
Shou
