Oh, good, that makes it easy. Do you want to apply the fix or shall I?
I will have normal access to Internet only on Monday. It can easy wait
for me :)
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desir
Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It looks to me like the values calculated by this routine end up on
>> disk, and therefore we can't fix it without forcing an initdb, or
>> at least REINDEX of all affected indexes. Is that correct?
>>
> No. query_gist.c exists only in HEAD branch.
O
the bottom half might be messed up too. So we are failing to exploit
the full intended "sign" space, which presumably is costing something
in index efficiency.
You are absolutly right. My fault.
It looks to me like the values calculated by this routine end up on
disk, and therefore we ca
