Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-10-01 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I really don't get the libedit-preferred syntax? Why not just: > >> --with-libedit use BSD Libedit not GNU Readline >> --with-readline use GNU Readline not BSD Libedit >> --without-readline do not use GNU Readline nor BSD Lib

Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-10-01 Thread Tom Lane
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I really don't get the libedit-preferred syntax? Why not just: > --with-libedituse BSD Libedit not GNU Readline > --with-readline use GNU Readline not BSD Libedit > --without-readline do not use GNU Readline nor BSD Libedit Well, the point i

Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think the switches are confusing ... when you are using libedit, you >> certainly don't want readline as well, so it seems natural to disable >> it. I understand that what --without-readline really does is turn the >> line-editing c

Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD > > On what platform, and with what version of libedit? I built HEAD just > yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with Apple's libedit. > >> Configured with: >

Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the switches are confusing ... when you are using libedit, you > certainly don't want readline as well, so it seems natural to disable > it. I understand that what --without-readline really does is turn the > line-editing capability off in gener

Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD > > > > On what platform, and with what version of libedit? I built HEAD just > > yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with A

Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD > > On what platform, and with what version of libedit? I built HEAD just > yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with Apple's libedit. we have (a bit of) buil

Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD On what platform, and with what version of libedit? I built HEAD just yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with Apple's libedit. > Configured with: > ./configure --with-libedit