On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joel Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> This will allow you to run a single postgres in a single jail only one
> >> user would have access to it. If you try to run more then one it will
> >> try to use the same shared memory and crash.
>
> > Is this,
"Joel Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This will allow you to run a single postgres in a single jail only one
>> user would have access to it. If you try to run more then one it will
>> try to use the same shared memory and crash.
> Is this, in fact, the case?
Unless BSD jails have very b
> You need to get your provider to set the sysctl jail.sysvipc_allowed to
> 1 in the host environment. If they're not willing to do this for you, we
> provide this feature on our servers, and also have a shared Postgres
> database you can use.
My ISP responds to this point:
"""
>In the thread on
> -Original Message-
> From: Alastair D'Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:52 PM
> To: 'Vince Vielhaber'; 'Joel Burton'
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] initdb dies during IpcSemaphoreCreate
TECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb dies during IpcSemaphoreCreate
> under BSD jail
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Joel Burton wrote:
>
> > (posted last week to pgsql-general; no responses there, so
> I'm seeing
> > if anyone here can contribute. Thank
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Joel Burton wrote:
> (posted last week to pgsql-general; no responses there, so I'm seeing if
> anyone here can contribute. Thanks!)
>
>
> I'm working on a site hosted in a BSD Jail; they have MySQL installed but,
> of course, I'd rather use PostgreSQL.
>
> It installs fine b
