Nicolai Petri wrote:
> If people hate contrib so much why not just get rid of it forever.. Either it
> should embrace as much small contrib modules as possible - else it should
> disappear in my opinion.
Actually that's partly the intention. Several contrib modules have been
removed in the rec
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 19:49, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:06:09PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > hi
> > some time ago i was told on postgresql-general about existence of
> > "hstore" package for postgresql.
> > as i understand it is being developed by the same gu
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:06:09PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> hi
> some time ago i was told on postgresql-general about existence of "hstore"
> package for postgresql.
> as i understand it is being developed by the same guys that are behind
> tsearch2, gin and (at least) recent chang
hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
i have number of projects coming to my mind which could take advantage
of something like this. the simplest thing is e-commerce site, where all
custom fields (fields dependand on product type) can be stored in one,
easily retrievable, field - thus reducing data
