Tom Lane writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There's a TODO item to make elog(LOG) a separate level. I propose the
> > name INFO. It would be identical to DEBUG in effect, only with a
> > different label.
>
> This conveys nothing to my mind. How should I determine whethe
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's a TODO item to make elog(LOG) a separate level. I propose the
> name INFO. It would be identical to DEBUG in effect, only with a
> different label.
This conveys nothing to my mind. How should I determine whether a given
elog call ought to
* Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010505 02:06] wrote:
> There's a TODO item to make elog(LOG) a separate level. I propose the
> name INFO. It would be identical to DEBUG in effect, only with a
> different label. Additionally, all DEBUG logging should either be
> disabled unless the debug
