On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jeff Janes writes:
>> > commit 1aba62ec made zero be an illegal value for effective_io_concurrency.
>> > i think this was an accident. If not, then the sample postgresql.conf
>> > (at least) needs to be updated.
>>
>> I
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Janes writes:
> > commit 1aba62ec made zero be an illegal value for effective_io_concurrency.
> > i think this was an accident. If not, then the sample postgresql.conf
> > (at least) needs to be updated.
>
> It looks like the problem is that the new range check
>
> + /*
Jeff Janes writes:
> commit 1aba62ec made zero be an illegal value for effective_io_concurrency.
> i think this was an accident. If not, then the sample postgresql.conf
> (at least) needs to be updated.
It looks like the problem is that the new range check
+ /* This range check shouldn't fail
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think this is a mistake. For example, we allow setting ssl to false
> even if SSL support is not compiled in.
+1
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your su
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Just how helpful is effective_io_concurrency? Did someone produce a
> benchmark at some point?
Attached is a benchmark I put together a while ago.
I don't know how close to "real world" it might be. I haven't seen it
in the wild, but I'
On 30 August 2012 20:28, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> But it might be better yet to make ordinary index scans benefit from
>> effective_io_concurrency, but even if/when that gets done it would
>> probably still be worthwhile to make the planner unders
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> From my attempted reading of the thread "posix_fadvise v22", it seems
> like modification of the planner was never discussed, rather than
> being discussed and rejected. So, is there a reason not to make the
> planner take account of effective_