On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:08:00PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > > > Maybe
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:35:29PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > > Maybe it uses a different CVS or something. Who knows? Aren't our diffs
> > > supp
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Maybe it uses a different CVS or something. Who knows? Aren't our diffs
> > supposed to be done ignoring whitespace?
>
> pg_init() in pg_regress_ecpg.c has:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:17:05AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Maybe it uses a different CVS or something. Who knows? Aren't our diffs
> supposed to be done ignoring whitespace?
pg_init() in pg_regress_ecpg.c has:
/* no reason to set -w for ecpg checks, except for when on windows */
Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:47:58AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The ECPG regression tests appear to be broken on MinGW (see buildfarm
trout and vaquita). Please tell me that this isn't a line ending problem
like it appears on cursory inspection.
It certainly l
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 07:47:58AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> The ECPG regression tests appear to be broken on MinGW (see buildfarm
> trout and vaquita). Please tell me that this isn't a line ending problem
> like it appears on cursory inspection.
It certainly looks like that, but yak is
