Re: [HACKERS] docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended

2009-08-07 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > > Bruce asked me to look for places in the docs that mention that an > > > ANALYZE is recommended, to mention the possibility that autovacuum takes > > > care. This patch does that. > > > > I think you found the right places

Re: [HACKERS] docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended

2009-08-06 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > Bruce asked me to look for places in the docs that mention that an > > ANALYZE is recommended, to mention the possibility that autovacuum takes > > care. This patch does that. > > I think you found the right places to touch, but is "let the autovacuum

Re: [HACKERS] docs: mention autovacuum when ANALYZE is recommended

2009-04-28 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera writes: > Bruce asked me to look for places in the docs that mention that an > ANALYZE is recommended, to mention the possibility that autovacuum takes > care. This patch does that. I think you found the right places to touch, but is "let the autovacuum daemon do it" sufficient?