Re: [HACKERS] dblink for 8.4 should work without user-mappings

2010-02-24 Thread Takahiro Itagaki
Bruce Momjian wrote: > What happened to this patch? It was rejected because SQL standard always requires an user mapping. I agree about the decision, too. > --- > Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > > contrib/dblink in 8.4 supports

Re: [HACKERS] dblink for 8.4 should work without user-mappings

2010-02-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
What happened to this patch? --- Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > contrib/dblink in 8.4 supports a server name by CREATE SERVER for connection > string, but it always requires an user-mapping (by CREATE USER MAPPING). > However, I

Re: [HACKERS] dblink for 8.4 should work without user-mappings

2009-06-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 05:42:01 Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > contrib/dblink in 8.4 supports a server name by CREATE SERVER for > connection string, but it always requires an user-mapping (by CREATE USER > MAPPING). However, I think it should work user-mappings because it works > when the connection