So what is the thinking of HACKERS?
Does it make sense to include nothing and rather allow each
distribution to support its own?
Or should each distribution known to support postgres be invited to
submit the relevant script for inclusion? And, if so, should this be a
HACKERS [or other appropria
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > I'd love to see a comment added to the linux start-script included in
> > contrib that referenced update-rc.d. It's useful to note because
> > Debian has different runlevels from Red Hat, and update-rc.d will
> > intellig
Sure. I didn't know there was a Debian start script. Because we
frequently keep up with the latest changes in postgres (which we
regularly use), I always build postgres from source. But that would be
a perfectly acceptable solution.
-tfo
On Aug 27, 2004, at 12:45 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tho
Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> I'd love to see a comment added to the linux start-script included in
> contrib that referenced update-rc.d. It's useful to note because
> Debian has different runlevels from Red Hat, and update-rc.d will
> intelligently do the same thing as chkconfig for Debian systems.
