Re: [HACKERS] compilation with libeditpreferred is broken

2009-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
Zdenek Kotala writes: > I attached conservative version of patch which only reorder #define to > avoid cross including half from readline and half from editline. Applied, thanks. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To

Re: [HACKERS] compilation with libeditpreferred is broken

2009-08-12 Thread Zdenek Kotala
I attached conservative version of patch which only reorder #define to avoid cross including half from readline and half from editline. Zdenek Tom Lane píše v čt 06. 08. 2009 v 18:13 -0400: > Zdenek Kotala writes: > > It seems to me that editline never distributed history.h file and > >

Re: [HACKERS] compilation with libeditpreferred is broken

2009-08-07 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Dne 7.08.09 00:13, Tom Lane napsal(a): Zdenek Kotala writes: It seems to me that editline never distributed history.h file and HAVE_EDITLINE_HISTORY_H is nonsense. But I'm not sure. I wouldn't count on that, in part because there are so many versions of editline. On an OS X machine I see $

Re: [HACKERS] compilation with libeditpreferred is broken

2009-08-06 Thread Tom Lane
Zdenek Kotala writes: > It seems to me that editline never distributed history.h file and > HAVE_EDITLINE_HISTORY_H is nonsense. But I'm not sure. I wouldn't count on that, in part because there are so many versions of editline. On an OS X machine I see $ ls -l /usr/include/*line* /usr/include/