On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> But I don't know what to do about the problem of needing to know how
> many backends there are. I agree with Andres that it's not very
> friendly to enforce a restriction that all the same worker processes
> must be present on the standby.
O
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Andres Freund escribió:
>> I wonder if we shouldn't make background workers use connections slots
>> from max_connections similar to how superuser_reserved_connections
>> work. That would mean we don't need to care about it for HS.
>
> I re
Andres Freund escribió:
> I wonder if we shouldn't make background workers use connections slots
> from max_connections similar to how superuser_reserved_connections
> work. That would mean we don't need to care about it for HS.
I remember considering this and concluding that it's messy. Suppose
Hi,
On 2013-05-24 09:48:03 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> CheckRequiredParameterValues() has some code that, when hot standby is
> in use, checks the values of max_connections,
> max_prepared_transactions, and max_locks_per_transaction against the
> master. The comment says "we must have at least a
