Neil Conway wrote:
I'd like to make add_missing_from=false the default for 8.1. Any
objections?
FYI, I've applied a patch that makes this change to CVS HEAD.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTEC
Tom Lane wrote:
Huh? DELETE hasn't got a tlist to transform ...
Yeah -- on looking closer, the patch copied and pasted a bunch of tlist
transformation code from UPDATE, but AFAICS there is no need for it.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>> Are you talking about DELETE FROM bar USING foo ? I submitted a patch
>> some months ago.
> At a quick glance, looks pretty good. It needs regression tests, and I'd
> also like to refactor the analyze.c additions to use
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
Are you talking about DELETE FROM bar USING foo ? I submitted a patch
some months ago.
At a quick glance, looks pretty good. It needs regression tests, and I'd
also like to refactor the analyze.c additions to use the same code
UPDATE uses for the tlist transformat
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Wow, seems I lost that somehow.
>
> BTW, I personally think it is fine for patch submitters to send "ping"
> mails if your patch is not applied or reviewed within a reasonable
> period of time -- this is standard practice among the GCC community,
>
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Wow, seems I lost that somehow.
BTW, I personally think it is fine for patch submitters to send "ping"
mails if your patch is not applied or reviewed within a reasonable
period of time -- this is standard practice among the GCC community,
for example. I certainly have a ten
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > I'd like to make add_missing_from=false the default for 8.1. Any
> > objections?
> >
> > We still don't have a solution for DELETE, do we?
> >
> Are you talking about DELETE FROM bar USING foo ? I submitted a patch
> some months ago.
> http://archiv
Hi,
> > I'd like to make add_missing_from=false the default for 8.1. Any
> objections?
>
> We still don't have a solution for DELETE, do we?
>
Are you talking about DELETE FROM bar USING foo ? I submitted a patch
some months ago.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-12/msg00169.php
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to make add_missing_from=false the default for 8.1. Any objections?
We still don't have a solution for DELETE, do we?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the p
