Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> Dave Gudeman wrote:
>> I don't need to add new node types or add any syntax; it is the output that
>> I'm concerned with. What I want is a way to print a tree according to some
>> pretty strict rules. For example, I want a special syntax for function RTEs
>> and I don'
Dave Gudeman wrote:
I don't need to add new node types or add any syntax; it is the output that
I'm concerned with. What I want is a way to print a tree according to some
pretty strict rules. For example, I want a special syntax for function RTEs
and I don't want the v::type notation to be output
I don't need to add new node types or add any syntax; it is the output that
I'm concerned with. What I want is a way to print a tree according to some
pretty strict rules. For example, I want a special syntax for function RTEs
and I don't want the v::type notation to be output (the flag to turn it
Dave Gudeman writes:
> I would replace this with a table-driven deparser:
> deparse_table[nodeTag(node)](node, context);
I don't actually see what this is going to buy for you. You didn't
say exactly why ruleutils doesn't work for you, but reading between
the lines suggests that you want
