On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 08/31/2012 06:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what we need to do to progress on this, especially re the
>>> back branches.
>>
>> The calendar might help us here. 9.2 is due to wrap next week, b
On 08/31/2012 06:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
I'm not sure what we need to do to progress on this, especially re the
back branches.
The calendar might help us here. 9.2 is due to wrap next week, but it
will likely be a couple of months before we contemplate new back-branch
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> I'm not sure what we need to do to progress on this, especially re the
> back branches.
The calendar might help us here. 9.2 is due to wrap next week, but it
will likely be a couple of months before we contemplate new back-branch
releases. So we could push a fix that
On 08/31/2012 03:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dave Page writes:
As a side note - I'm not sure why _USE_32BIT_TIME_T was removed in the
first place; it was added specifically to avoid this sort of problem,
though iirc at the time we were thinking of extensions like Slony and
PostGIS being built with
Dave Page writes:
> As a side note - I'm not sure why _USE_32BIT_TIME_T was removed in the
> first place; it was added specifically to avoid this sort of problem,
> though iirc at the time we were thinking of extensions like Slony and
> PostGIS being built with Mingw for use with the VC++ built se
On 08/31/2012 01:10 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 08/31/2012 12:41 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 08/31/2012 12:18 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 08/31/2012 12:41 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Dunstan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/31/2012 12:18 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
>
> O
On 08/31/2012 12:41 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 08/31/2012 12:18 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 08/31/2012 11:14 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 08/31/2012 12:18 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/31/2012 11:14 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
>
> O
On 08/31/2012 12:18 PM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 08/31/2012 11:14 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan
wrote:
On 08/31/2012 11:05 AM, Dave Page wrote:
I've added this to the release blockers section for 9.2 o
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> On 08/31/2012 11:14 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan
>>> wrote:
On 08/31/2012 11:05 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> I've added t
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 08/31/2012 11:14 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/31/2012 11:05 AM, Dave Page wrote:
I've added this to the release blockers section for 9.2 on the wiki,
On 08/31/2012 11:14 AM, Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 08/31/2012 11:05 AM, Dave Page wrote:
I've added this to the release blockers section for 9.2 on the wiki,
as without it, pl/perl is unusable on Win32.
I'll have a look at it today.
Thanks A
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 08/31/2012 11:05 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> I've added this to the release blockers section for 9.2 on the wiki,
>> as without it, pl/perl is unusable on Win32.
>
>
>
> I'll have a look at it today.
Thanks Andrew - minor clarification;
On 08/31/2012 11:05 AM, Dave Page wrote:
I've added this to the release blockers section for 9.2 on the wiki,
as without it, pl/perl is unusable on Win32.
I'll have a look at it today.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
I've added this to the release blockers section for 9.2 on the wiki,
as without it, pl/perl is unusable on Win32.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Owais Khan
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are getting crash while using plperl on Win32 as ActiveSt
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Owais Khan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are getting crash while using plperl on Win32 as ActiveState perl(Win32)
> uses 32-bit time_t structures. So, We have to compile DB Server's code also
> with 32-bit time_t structure.
>
> Patch is adding _USE_32BIT_TIME_T in preproc
17 matches
Mail list logo
