Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think these two justify declaring the Windows port at EOL prior to
> 8.2. The others probably not so much. (Who cares if pg_regress is not a
> C program? Who besides developers uses it?)
The reason to care about it is that the lack of it guarantees
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> * The stats collector bug which prevented stats being collected
>> reliably, thus causing all the expected knock on effects (including
>> near-total failure of autovacuum). The 8.2 fix for this was dependent
>> on the redesign of the collector to
Dave Page wrote:
* The stats collector bug which prevented stats being collected
reliably, thus causing all the expected knock on effects (including
near-total failure of autovacuum). The 8.2 fix for this was dependent
on the redesign of the collector to remove the separate stats buffering
pro
