Re: [HACKERS] Win32 sysconfig -> pg_service.conf

2006-04-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > David Fetter wrote: > > >>>doesn't report anything by way of --sysconfdir, which in turn means > >>>that people have to do some fragile hackery in order even to see a > >>>pg_service.conf file. Can we put such a configuration directive > >>>into the binary builds? I

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 sysconfig -> pg_service.conf

2006-03-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
David Fetter wrote: doesn't report anything by way of --sysconfdir, which in turn means that people have to do some fragile hackery in order even to see a pg_service.conf file. Can we put such a configuration directive into the binary builds? Is this known to work? In any case, the d

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 sysconfig -> pg_service.conf

2006-03-29 Thread David Fetter
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:53:13PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > David Fetter wrote: > >Folks, > > > >I'm trying to get pg_service.conf working on Windows so we can > >standardize on a way of doing things cross-platform, and noticed > >that > > > >pg_config.exe --configure > > why are you using t

Re: [HACKERS] Win32 sysconfig -> pg_service.conf

2006-03-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
David Fetter wrote: Folks, I'm trying to get pg_service.conf working on Windows so we can standardize on a way of doing things cross-platform, and noticed that pg_config.exe --configure why are you using this flag? if you leave it off you will see everything. doesn't report anything by