Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am now warning that we have an unusually large number of open items
> that must be either completed or moved to the TODO list before 8.4 can
> be released.
More threads to remove:
* [BUGS] BUG #4553: HOLD cursors not materializing results fully
was fixed here:
rev
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >
> >> As-is, this list is completely unhelpful. It looks like you've dumped
> >> all your unread mail onto this page and asked the rest of us to sort it
> >> for you. I'm sorry, but I've got ot
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>
> Robert Haas p??e v ?t 06. 01. 2009 v 12:38 -0500:
>
> > - WIP: Page space reservation (pgupgrade) is an idea that was
> > rejected, IIRC. pg_upgrade project status is more of the same thing.
> > there are several more pg_upgrade related items on here as well, most
> > of
Robert Haas píše v út 06. 01. 2009 v 12:38 -0500:
> - WIP: Page space reservation (pgupgrade) is an idea that was
> rejected, IIRC. pg_upgrade project status is more of the same thing.
> there are several more pg_upgrade related items on here as well, most
> of which are probably unnecessary.
sp
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> As-is, this list is completely unhelpful. It looks like you've dumped
>> all your unread mail onto this page and asked the rest of us to sort it
>> for you. I'm sorry, but I've got other things to do.
>
> That explains
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Everyone knows about the commit fest wiki items, but I am tracking 291
threads that need some type of attention; if only 50% of them are
significant for 8.4, that still leaves +100 items that should be
completed in the next month. You can see the fu
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> - WIP: Hash Join-Filter Pruning using Bloom Filters is in the commitfest
I'm pulling this patch and resubmitting for 8.5.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 18:49:00 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > If people have further updates please, please send them (with subject
> > headings please).
>
> Most of the entries are quite frankly junk, either already committed, already
> rejected, patches not under consid
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 18:49:00 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If people have further updates please, please send them (with subject
> headings please).
Most of the entries are quite frankly junk, either already committed, already
rejected, patches not under consideration, irrelevant discussions, or
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Most of the entries are quite frankly junk,
>
> > That was the same reaction Tom had. Again, many might be junk, but is
> > it 100% junk. What about:
>
> > 8.4 - psql output for \l
>
> Done (and this is
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Most of the entries are quite frankly junk,
> That was the same reaction Tom had. Again, many might be junk, but is
> it 100% junk. What about:
> 8.4 - psql output for \l
Done (and this is on the commitfest page anyway)
It seems like it would be helpful if you made a pass through it
yourself just looking for duplicates and commitfest items, since it's
probably just as fast for you to find them and fix them as it is for
us to tell you about them - maybe faster, since the links on this page
don't seem to work very w
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 11:30 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:21 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > I have already approached developers to get help in completing these
> > > items, but got little assistance.
> >
> > If you can send me the list
Robert Haas wrote:
> > Can you give subject lines on this? I didn't mean for people to
> > actually start working on items, but rather just to see the scope of the
> > problem.
>
> Hmm, well, when you are ready for people to start working on items, I
> might be able to work on some items, if ther
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am now warning that we have an unusually large number of open items
> that must be either completed or moved to the TODO list before 8.4 can
> be released.
>
> Everyone knows about the commit fest wiki items, but I am tracking 291
> threads that need some type of attenti
> Can you give subject lines on this? I didn't mean for people to
> actually start working on items, but rather just to see the scope of the
> problem.
Hmm, well, when you are ready for people to start working on items, I
might be able to work on some items, if there are things that a
non-core, n
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> 243 seems like a priority for release :-p
[GENERAL] happy holidays, christmas etc.,
>> 253 was a website issue that's been fixed.
[pgsql-www] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Problem with "File Browser" link on
downloadspage
>> 15
Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
>
> >> 243 seems like a priority for release :-p
>
> [GENERAL] happy holidays, christmas etc.,
Removed.
> >> 253 was a website issue that's been fixed.
>
> [pgsql-www] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Problem wit
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Everyone knows about the commit fest wiki items, but I am tracking 291
> > threads that need some type of attention; if only 50% of them are
> > significant for 8.4, that still leaves +100 items that should be
> > completed in the next month. Y
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:21 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have already approached developers to get help in completing these
> items, but got little assistance.
If you can send me the list that you think applies to me, I'll work on
it. I don't want to spend the time to read every entry if you
Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am now warning that we have an unusually large number of open items
> > that must be either completed or moved to the TODO list before 8.4 can
> > be released.
> >
> > Everyone knows about the commit fest wiki items, but
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am now warning that we have an unusually large number of open items
> that must be either completed or moved to the TODO list before 8.4 can
> be released.
>
> Everyone knows about the commit fest wiki items, but I am tracking 291
> threads
I realize the list is incomplete and inaccurate. My point is if only
50% need work, we still have lots of work to do.
I will update my mailbox and post a new version soon.
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Everyone knows about the commit fest wiki items, but I am tracking 291
> threads that need some type of attention; if only 50% of them are
> significant for 8.4, that still leaves +100 items that should be
> completed in the next month. You can see the full list here:
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Everyone knows about the commit fest wiki items, but I am tracking 291
> > threads that need some type of attention; if only 50% of them are
> > significant for 8.4, that still leaves +100 items that should be
> > completed in the next month. You can
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Everyone knows about the commit fest wiki items, but I am tracking 291
> threads that need some type of attention; if only 50% of them are
> significant for 8.4, that still leaves +100 items that should be
> completed in the next month. You can see the full list here:
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
