Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Right. The 2PC connection is another reason to do it that way --- 2PC
>> would require some way to save locks anyhow, and it'd be nice if there
>> were only one mechanism to deal with not two.
> AFAICS, heap_
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hackers,
In access/heap/heapam.c, in heap_mark4update(), there's a comment that
states
/*
* XLOG stuff: no logging is required as long as we have no
* savepoints. For savepoints private log co
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hackers,
> In access/heap/heapam.c, in heap_mark4update(), there's a comment that
> states
> /*
>* XLOG stuff: no logging is required as long as we have no
>* savepoints. For savepoints private log could be used...
>*/
> I
