Re: [HACKERS] WAL files format

2008-04-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
mito escribió: > What information are currently strored in WAL sequence ? Everything needed to replay each change, at the physical page level. -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] WAL files format

2008-04-20 Thread mito
What information are currently strored in WAL sequence ? Jonah H. Harris wrote: xlog.c :) On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Miloš Ország <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there any document describing WAL file format? On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [HACKERS] WAL files format

2008-04-20 Thread Jonah H. Harris
xlog.c :) On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Miloš Ország <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any document describing WAL file format? > > > > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > See xlogdump and xlogviewer. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] WAL files format

2008-04-20 Thread Harssh Mahajan
:P On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 5:14 PM, mito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > iam developing version control system based on content because i havent > found anything for postgres and it sounds like great tool to have. Propably > i will use Rules and Views with shadow tables, but iam interested i

Re: [HACKERS] WAL files format

2008-04-20 Thread Miloš Ország
Is there any document describing WAL file format? On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See xlogdump and xlogviewer. > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:44 AM, mito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > iam developing version control system based on content

Re: [HACKERS] WAL files format

2008-04-20 Thread Jonah H. Harris
See xlogdump and xlogviewer. On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:44 AM, mito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > iam developing version control system based on content because i havent > found anything for postgres and it sounds like great tool to have. Propably > i will use Rules and Views with shadow ta

Re: [HACKERS] WAL FILES

2002-05-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
ECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL FILES > > > > Olivier PRENANT wrote: > > > Hi every one. > > > > > > I just moved (at last!) to 7.2.1. Works li

Re: [HACKERS] WAL FILES

2002-05-28 Thread Olivier PRENANT
for your explanation. On Mon, 27 May 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 17:17:58 -0400 (EDT) > From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL FILES > > Oli

Re: [HACKERS] WAL FILES

2002-05-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Olivier PRENANT wrote: > Hi every one. > > I just moved (at last!) to 7.2.1. Works like a charm... > I'm suprised though by the number of WAL files. > > I have 8 files where postgresql.conf says WAL_FILES=4. > > What did I miss ? (I have no outstanding transaction) > > FWIW, t's on UW711. No,