> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 April 2003 20:59
> To: Robert Treat
> Cc: Peter Eisentraut; Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] View definition formatting
>
>
> We could make variants of pg_get_
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 14:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Perhaps as a workaround you could invent a standard indentation format and
> > format the rules automatically that way, so that users will be able to
> > find everything in the same place automatically a
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Would it be possible and sensible to store the original view definition
>> for future use, such as we do for functions? Perhaps a new catalog
>> (pg_source?) could store these and other definitions such as rules for
>> use?
> Not too obvi
