Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>> According to the docs, domains are not meant for that purpose, but
>> for changing constraints of a type. Is it possible to define a domain
>> that will have the same defaults and constraints as the base type,
>> but will have
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> According to the docs, domains are not meant for that purpose, but
> for changing constraints of a type. Is it possible to define a domain
> that will have the same defaults and constraints as the base type,
> but will have different comparison functions? Will that provide
