Patch applied. Thanks. Your documentation changes can be viewed on our
web site shortly.
---
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 10/4/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Now t
On 10/4/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now that we've renamed the server binary to "postgres", what is the
> > status on use of the name "postmaster"? Is it now deprecated? And if
> > not, is there any point in keeping it around?
>
> We sh
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> Seems it would be best to apply this
> nomenclature consistently, and simply drop the name "postmaster" from
> use.
>
+1 I agree the term postmaster references in the docs, etc should
go away - with perhaps the exception of one faq that say that
postmaster's a deprecated na
"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that we've renamed the server binary to "postgres", what is the
> status on use of the name "postmaster"? Is it now deprecated? And if
> not, is there any point in keeping it around?
I'm certainly not for removing the term from either the code or
