[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Marc G. Fournier") writes:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> > Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work
>> > yourself? If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be
>> > willing to contribute some effort to PITR. (It's been made c
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> > If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
> > some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> > wants PITR in 7.5
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> > If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
> > some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> > wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
>
> What is Re
Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
What is RedHat's interest in PostgreSQL? Last time I heard th
>Bruce Momjian wrote
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > [ expecting to finish PITR by early June ]
> >
> > > Is this all still OK for 7.5? (My attempts at cataloguing
> changes has
> > > fallen by the wayside in concentrating on the more
> important task of
> > >
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > BTW... PITR, Windows port, possibly Tablespaces and more... Does the
> > core team intend to use 8.0 instead of 7.5?
>
> It's premature to have that discussion yet, IMHO. When we get close
> to beta and know what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Is this all still OK for 7.5? (My attempts at cataloguing changes has
> > fallen by the wayside in concentrating on the more important task of
> > PITR.) Do we have a planned freeze month yet?
>
> There'
Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW... PITR, Windows port, possibly Tablespaces and more... Does the
> core team intend to use 8.0 instead of 7.5?
It's premature to have that discussion yet, IMHO. When we get close
to beta and know what the feature list will look like, we can think
a
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [ expecting to finish PITR by early June ]
>
> > Is this all still OK for 7.5? (My attempts at cataloguing changes has
> > fallen by the wayside in concentrating on the more important task of
> > PITR.) Do we have a planned freeze mon
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is your timeline based on the assumption of doing all the work yourself?
> If so, how about farming out some of it? I'd be willing to contribute
> some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear to me that Red Hat really
> wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
Hey, us Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd be willing to contribute some effort to PITR. (It's been made clear
> to me that Red Hat really wants PITR in 7.5 ;-))
Wow! That's exciting news :-) Does Red Hat also want some more enterprise
feat
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ expecting to finish PITR by early June ]
> Is this all still OK for 7.5? (My attempts at cataloguing changes has
> fallen by the wayside in concentrating on the more important task of
> PITR.) Do we have a planned freeze month yet?
There's not really
12 matches
Mail list logo
