On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, jtv wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:20:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Has the author been given CVS access yet?
> >
> > Yes, he has. I got him in touch with Marc. I was just pointing out
> > that while he knows C++, he needs help getting the connecting stu
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:20:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Has the author been given CVS access yet?
>
> Yes, he has. I got him in touch with Marc. I was just pointing out
> that while he knows C++, he needs help getting the connecting stuff
> merged to our coding style.
Haven't h
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:18:16AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
> dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am
> particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No
> doubt both of
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
> > > dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am
> > > particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No
> > > doubt both of these things are us
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:06:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Personally, I'm uneasy about carrying around another interface library
> > > that appears to have no basis in any sort of standard.
>
> Erm, upon which standards are the other lan
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:06:10PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Personally, I'm uneasy about carrying around another interface library
> > that appears to have no basis in any sort of standard.
Erm, upon which standards are the other language interfaces based?
> The
> > There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
> > dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am
> > particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No
> > doubt both of these things are useful in the end, but as they are right
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There seems to have been an accumulation lately of stuff that was simply
> dumped into the source tree without any sort of integration. I am
> particularly talking about interfaces/ssl and interfaces/libpqxx. No
> doubt both of these things are useful in the end, but as
