On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 02:00:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes:
> > The CRC-64 code used in the SWISS-PROT genetic database is (now) at:
> > ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/software/swissprot/Swissknife/old/SPcrc.tar.gz
>
> > From the README:
>
> > The code
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes:
> The CRC-64 code used in the SWISS-PROT genetic database is (now) at:
> ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/software/swissprot/Swissknife/old/SPcrc.tar.gz
> From the README:
> The code in this package has been derived from the BTLib package
> obtained fr
> > Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Correct CRC WAL code to be normal CRC32 algorithm
>
> Um, how about
>
> * Correct CRC WAL code to be a real CRC64 algorithm
>
> instead?
Done.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (6
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:17:19PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:53:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I just took a close look at the COMP_CRC64 macro in xlog.c.
> > >
> > > This isn't a 64-bit CRC. It's two independent 32-bit CRCs, one done
> > > on just the odd-num
Added to TODO:
* Correct CRC WAL code to be normal CRC32 algorithm
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:53:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I just took a close look at the COMP_CRC64 macro in xlog.c.
> >
> > This isn't a 64-bit CRC. It's two independent 32-bit CRCs, one done
> > on just the od
I will just add a TODO item and we can hit it for 7.2.
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:53:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I just took a close look at the COMP_CRC64 macro in xlog.c.
> >
> > This isn't a 64-bit CRC. It's two independent 32-bit CRCs, one done
> > on just the odd-numbered bytes and
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 04:53:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I just took a close look at the COMP_CRC64 macro in xlog.c.
>
> This isn't a 64-bit CRC. It's two independent 32-bit CRCs, one done
> on just the odd-numbered bytes and one on just the even-numbered bytes
> of the datastream. That's ha
