Re: [HACKERS] Threaded Python vs. PostGreSQL plpython

2003-03-25 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > On 24 Mar 2003 at 11:45, Mike Meyer wrote: Just to clarify, the current situation is that I have things working, but I also have a libpython.so that isn't threaded. I'm not happy about the latter, and worry about rebuilding a

Re: [HACKERS] Threaded Python vs. PostGreSQL plpython

2003-03-24 Thread Shridhar Daithankar
On 24 Mar 2003 at 11:45, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Shridhar Daithankar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> typed: > > Well, I believe, if you link a library against libc_r explicitly, then even if > > it is loaded by a program which is not linked against it would do

Re: [HACKERS] Threaded Python vs. PostGreSQL plpython

2003-03-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Mike Meyer writes: > The problem is that the ports system build python with thread > support. postmaster doesn't have thread support, so when the > libpython2.2.so is dynamically loaded, it fails to find the thread > functions, and the load fails. What is "thread support", what are "the thread fu