On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:00:24PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Neil, all:
>
> > If people are interested in the status of a patch, I think it's
> > fine for them to email the person who's volunteered to work on it.
>
> The problem I would like to see resolved is that there is currently
> no accur
Josh Berkus wrote:
I doubt that any TODO system would have 100% participation, and I know that it
would depend on having some non-hacker volunteers updating the information on
behalf of developers who didn't want to use it. However, I think that
getting those volunteers is entirely possible (
Neil, all:
> If people are interested in the status of a patch, I think it's fine for
> them to email the person who's volunteered to work on it.
The problem I would like to see resolved is that there is currently no
accurate way to determine who is working on a patch except by comprehensive
-h