Re: [HACKERS] TODO system WAS: 8.2 features status

2006-08-06 Thread David Fetter
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:00:24PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Neil, all: > > > If people are interested in the status of a patch, I think it's > > fine for them to email the person who's volunteered to work on it. > > The problem I would like to see resolved is that there is currently > no accur

Re: [HACKERS] TODO system WAS: 8.2 features status

2006-08-05 Thread Lukas Smith
Josh Berkus wrote: I doubt that any TODO system would have 100% participation, and I know that it would depend on having some non-hacker volunteers updating the information on behalf of developers who didn't want to use it. However, I think that getting those volunteers is entirely possible (

Re: [HACKERS] TODO system WAS: 8.2 features status

2006-08-05 Thread Josh Berkus
Neil, all: > If people are interested in the status of a patch, I think it's fine for > them to email the person who's volunteered to work on it. The problem I would like to see resolved is that there is currently no accurate way to determine who is working on a patch except by comprehensive -h