On 9/10/12 9:26 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I remember trying to do this for the mb/conversion_procs subdir years
> ago, to make them build in parallel to save some time. It didn't go
> anywhere but the basic idea seems similar in spirit. Maybe we can use
> this there too to make it fast.
Parall
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of lun sep 10 09:50:42 -0300 2012:
> On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 03:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Another problem is that Makefile.shlib isn't designed to build more
> > >> than one shared library per directory,
> >
> > > That's the main problem, but fixing it
On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 03:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Another problem is that Makefile.shlib isn't designed to build more
> >> than one shared library per directory,
>
> > That's the main problem, but fixing it would be very useful in other
> > places as well. I had it on my radar to do somethi
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> To give you an idea of what "unreasonably painful" means, attached is
>> the specfile diff needed to make this happen. I will not comment on
>> the fragility of this beyond observing that the "touch -r" commands
>> a
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> To give you an idea of what "unreasonably painful" means, attached is
> the specfile diff needed to make this happen. I will not comment on
> the fragility of this beyond observing that the "touch -r" commands
> are *necessary*, else you get inc