Noah Misch writes:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:50:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alternatively, we could do something like you suggest but adjust the
>> second join so that it suppresses only rows in which mapped_oid is null
>> *and* there's no longer a matching OID in pg_class. That would provi
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:50:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alternatively, we could do something like you suggest but adjust the
> second join so that it suppresses only rows in which mapped_oid is null
> *and* there's no longer a matching OID in pg_class. That would provide
> additional confidenc
Noah Misch writes:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:44:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund writes:
>>> On 2014-06-12 00:38:36 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2014-06-12%2000%3A17%3A07
>>> Hm. My guess it's that it's just a '
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:44:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-06-12 00:38:36 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2014-06-12%2000%3A17%3A07
>
> > Hm. My guess it's that it's just a 'harmless' concurrency
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-06-12 00:38:36 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
>> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2014-06-12%2000%3A17%3A07
> Hm. My guess it's that it's just a 'harmless' concurrency issue. The
> test currently run in concurrency with others: I think
On 2014-06-12 00:38:36 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:28:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund writes:
> > >> On 2014-03-27 08:02:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >>> Buildfarm member prairiedog thinks there's something unreliable about
> > >>> commit f01d1ae3a104019d6d
Noah Misch writes:
> The improved test just tripped:
> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2014-06-12%2000%3A17%3A07
Ugh. If the MTBF is circa three months, how will we catch this before
we're dead?
A quick look around the machine's buildfarm directory says ther
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 03:28:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> >> On 2014-03-27 08:02:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> Buildfarm member prairiedog thinks there's something unreliable about
> >>> commit f01d1ae3a104019d6d68aeff85c4816a275130b3:
>
> > So I had made a notice to r
Andres Freund writes:
>> On 2014-03-27 08:02:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Buildfarm member prairiedog thinks there's something unreliable about
>>> commit f01d1ae3a104019d6d68aeff85c4816a275130b3:
> So I had made a notice to recheck on
> this.
> http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_hist
On 2014-03-28 21:36:11 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-03-27 08:02:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Buildfarm member prairiedog thinks there's something unreliable about
> > commit f01d1ae3a104019d6d68aeff85c4816a275130b3:
>
> > ***
> > /Users/buildfarm/bf-data/HEAD/pgsql.13462/src/te
Andres Freund writes:
> I don't think it's necessary. As far as I understand LATERAL, a join to
> a function returning NULL will still return the row. So, the test now
> would only test whether there are rows in pg_class which seems a bit
> pointless.
Yeah, after looking closer I'd come to the sa
On 2014-03-28 16:45:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-03-28 16:41:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Any objection to separating out the have_mappings bit? It wasn't terribly
> >> appropriate before, but it seems really out of place in this formulation.
>
> > The patch I
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-03-28 16:41:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Any objection to separating out the have_mappings bit? It wasn't terribly
>> appropriate before, but it seems really out of place in this formulation.
> The patch I sent removed the have_mapping thing entirely? Do you mean
On 2014-03-28 16:41:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2014-03-27 08:02:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Buildfarm member prairiedog thinks there's something unreliable about
> >> commit f01d1ae3a104019d6d68aeff85c4816a275130b3:
>
> > That's rather odd. It has survived for a c
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2014-03-27 08:02:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Buildfarm member prairiedog thinks there's something unreliable about
>> commit f01d1ae3a104019d6d68aeff85c4816a275130b3:
> That's rather odd. It has survived for a couple of months on the other
> buildfarm animals now... Co
Hi,
On 2014-03-27 08:02:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Buildfarm member prairiedog thinks there's something unreliable about
> commit f01d1ae3a104019d6d68aeff85c4816a275130b3:
> ***
> /Users/buildfarm/bf-data/HEAD/pgsql.13462/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out
>Thu Mar 27 04:12:40 20
16 matches
Mail list logo
