Re: [HACKERS] Solution to UPDATE...INSERT problem

2003-03-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Uh, why exactly do you think this is race-free? > How about: > INSERT INTO table SELECT 1, 'foo' WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT TRUE FROM table > WHERE pkcol=1 FOR UPDATE); > It's a lot more straightforward and has a FOR UPDATE. Can this still

Re: [HACKERS] Solution to UPDATE...INSERT problem

2003-03-26 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
> Uh, why exactly do you think this is race-free? > > It looks fancy, but AFAICS the SELECT will return info that is correct > as of its starting timestamp; which is not enough to guarantee that the > INSERT won't conflict with another transaction doing the same thing > concurrently. How about:

Re: [HACKERS] Solution to UPDATE...INSERT problem

2003-03-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > INSERT INTO table SELECT 1, 'foo' EXCEPT SELECT 1, 'foo' FROM table WHERE > pkcol=1; > See? So now that INSERT statement will insert the row if it doesn't exist, > or insert zero rows if it does. You are then guaranteed that your > transacti