Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, for functions and operators the name alone is not sufficient to
>> uniquely identify the object. Type regproc currently throws an error
>> if asked to convert a nonunique function name; that severely limits its
>> usefulness. I'm
Tom Lane wrote:
> A variant of the idea of inventing functions is to extend the existing
> datatype 'regproc' to do this, and invent also 'regclass', 'regtype',
> 'regoperator' datatypes to do the lookups for the other object kinds.
> I proposed this in a different context last year,
> http:
