Re: [HACKERS] Second question on schemas and INDEX(es) ...

2003-10-15 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to > > read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to > > ask this one ... but ... is this documented so

Re: [HACKERS] Second question on schemas and INDEX(es) ...

2003-10-15 Thread Robert Treat
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:20, Robert Treat wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:00, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to > > read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to > > ask this one ... but ... is thi

Re: [HACKERS] Second question on schemas and INDEX(es) ...

2003-10-15 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Marc G. Fournier wrote: Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to ask this one ... but ... is this documented somewhere also: CREATE SCHEMA company_00244 CREATE TABLE traffic ( ip_id int4, por

Re: [HACKERS] Second question on schemas and INDEX(es) ...

2003-10-15 Thread Robert Treat
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:00, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to > read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to > ask this one ... but ... is this documented somewhere also: > > CREATE SCHEMA company_002

Re: [HACKERS] Second question on schemas and INDEX(es) ...

2003-10-15 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to > read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to > ask this one ... but ... is this documented somewhere also: CREATE INDEX isn't currently a "schema_