On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to
> > read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to
> > ask this one ... but ... is this documented so
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:20, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:00, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to
> > read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to
> > ask this one ... but ... is thi
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to
read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to
ask this one ... but ... is this documented somewhere also:
CREATE SCHEMA company_00244
CREATE TABLE traffic ( ip_id int4, por
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 16:00, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to
> read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to
> ask this one ... but ... is this documented somewhere also:
>
> CREATE SCHEMA company_002
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Okay, after feeling stupid about the last one (altho I hadn't thought to
> read the CREATE INDEX page, only the CREATE SCHEMA one), I really hate to
> ask this one ... but ... is this documented somewhere also:
CREATE INDEX isn't currently a "schema_