Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-07-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > There is also the tiny patch to trap lexical warnings I submitted not > > > long ago still outstanding. > > > > OK, I missed that one. I see it at: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg002

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-07-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > There is also the tiny patch to trap lexical warnings I submitted not > > long ago still outstanding. > > OK, I missed that one. I see it at: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00280.php I applied the attached patc

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-22 Thread Fabien COELHO
Dear Stephen, I'd really like to see role support added into 8.1. I'm also pretty interested in this, and was planing loosely to think about implementing roles someday. It is even better if it is done by someone else;-) I've sent Alvaro and Tom versions of the patch in the past and I was

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Neil Conway
Bruce Momjian wrote: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. It would be nice to upgrade to autoconf 2.59 before the freeze (although it would probably be okay to do this post-free

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus writes: > Oh, and in implementing the COPY stuff we realized that there weren't any > regression tests for encodings. If we can figure out how to do them, > we'll add those. Are new regression tests permitted during beta? Certainly. Feature freeze is about features, not correctn

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Josh Berkus wrote: People: Oh, and in implementing the COPY stuff we realized that there weren't any regression tests for encodings. If we can figure out how to do them, we'll add those. Are new regression tests permitted during beta? Yes, most definitely ... especiall

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Josh Berkus
People: Oh, and in implementing the COPY stuff we realized that there weren't any regression tests for encodings. If we can figure out how to do them, we'll add those. Are new regression tests permitted during beta? -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Michael Glaesemann
On Jun 21, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. I'm hoping to add documentation and regression tests for interval- >day over the n

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Michael Glaesemann
On Jun 21, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. I'm hoping to add documentation and regression tests for interval- >day over the nex

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, > which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze > on July 1. FWIW, I'm still working on column-level triggers, but the July 1st deadline should not be

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: > Is there an "Open Issues" list yet, as you usually prepare for releases? > If so, can you please put these items up on it? Yes, it is at: This item has been added to the 7.4 open items list: http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgopenitems It did contain only pgautov

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > There is also the tiny patch to trap lexical warnings I submitted not > long ago still outstanding. OK, I missed that one. I see it at: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00280.php However, I don't see the new regession files attached to tha

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Victor Y. Yegorov
I'll do my best to submit bitmap index AM patch next week for your review. -- Victor Y. Yegorov ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Bruce Momjian wrote: We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze on July 1. FYI - plperl status. I am trying to get the following 2 items done by feature freeze: . convert returned perl ar

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, Aside from the other stuff people mentioned, I have these things on my to-look-at list: * Fix pg_dump to be able to dump large objects in text dumps * Fix inherited constraints (per discussion around 5

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Stephen Frost
* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd really like to see role support added into 8.1. I've sent Alvaro > > and Tom versions of the patch in the past and I was planning on > > submitting it to -patches soon. There's a few remaining issue bu

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Tom Lane
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd really like to see role support added into 8.1. I've sent Alvaro > and Tom versions of the patch in the past and I was planning on > submitting it to -patches soon. There's a few remaining issue but I > don't think they'll take very long to

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Rod Taylor
> I realise there probably won't be time to fix pg_terminate_backend, or > convince people that it offers the admin the lesser of two evils (my > limited understanding being that there is a chance of it not clearing > some locks, vs, having to shut down the whole server to kill a single > connectio

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Stephen Frost
* Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote: > We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, > which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are ready for a feature freeze > on July 1. Bruce, I'd really like to see role support added into 8.1. I've sent Alvaro and Tom

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Oleg Bartunov
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian Sent: 21 June 2005 05:04 To: PostgreSQL-development Subject: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is work

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Magnus Hagander
> We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for > auto-vacuum, which Alvaro is working on, so I think we are > ready for a feature freeze on July 1. I don't beleive we have :-( The server instrumentation patch is not yet addressed. Last I checked there was the objections to pg_termi

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze

2005-06-21 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian > Sent: 21 June 2005 05:04 > To: PostgreSQL-development > Subject: [HACKERS] Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze > > We have addressed all the open issues for 8.1 except for auto-vacuum, >